Difference between revisions of "Talk:World of Warcraft"
Jump to navigationJump to search
(sure sure) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
: Well, if we '''did''' want to attract WoW playing people, I have a feeling the current status of the page would scare them away sh**less, or at the least just piss them off for having clicked on a worthless link. - [[User:RS David|HeavyD]] 11:04, 6 February 2009 (EST) | : Well, if we '''did''' want to attract WoW playing people, I have a feeling the current status of the page would scare them away sh**less, or at the least just piss them off for having clicked on a worthless link. - [[User:RS David|HeavyD]] 11:04, 6 February 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: It sounds like we do have one WoW fan. ;) We could delete this page and remove the disambig WoW page. Have WoW redirect to Week of War and also make sure WoW is listed on our abbreviations page (which I think it is). <span style="color:Purple">—</span> '''[[User:Fcsuper|<span style="color:#006699">f</span><span style="color:#6666FF">c</span><span style="color:#666699">s</span><span style="color:#336633">u</span><span style="color:#006699">p</span><span style="color:#6633FF">e</span><span style="color:#9966FF">r</span>]]'''<sup> ([[User talk:Fcsuper|<span style="color:Olive">What?</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Fcsuper|<span style="color:Teal">Where!</span>]])</sup> <sub>([http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Inclusionism <span style="color:Maroon">Inclusionistic</span>] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism <span style="color:Red">Eventualist</span>] ) </sub><span style="color:Purple">—</span> 15:30, 6 February 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:30, 6 February 2009
I was in favor of the AfD tag. However, upon looking at the "what links here" link, I am having second thoughts. However, it is unlikely someone looking for info on World of Warcraft will be coming to our wiki. And if they did, there's not much point in trying to attract them, unless by some small miracle that google will bring us potential new members who unwittingly find use by looking up sites that talk about WoW. :) — fcsuper (What?, Where!) (Inclusionistic Eventualist ) — 23:15, 5 February 2009 (EST)
- Well, if we did want to attract WoW playing people, I have a feeling the current status of the page would scare them away sh**less, or at the least just piss them off for having clicked on a worthless link. - HeavyD 11:04, 6 February 2009 (EST)
- It sounds like we do have one WoW fan. ;) We could delete this page and remove the disambig WoW page. Have WoW redirect to Week of War and also make sure WoW is listed on our abbreviations page (which I think it is). — fcsuper (What?, Where!) (Inclusionistic Eventualist ) — 15:30, 6 February 2009 (EST)
