Structure changes - Revision history

RS David: recat

2009-04-02T20:08:24Z

recat

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 2 April 2009
Line 132:		Line 132:
	* ( ) - Combine with AF		* ( ) - Combine with AF

	[[Category:~~Club Expansion~~]]		[[Category:Old Proposals]]

RS David: Category:Club Expansion temp

2009-04-01T18:22:35Z

Category:Club Expansion temp

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:22, 1 April 2009
Line 132:		Line 132:
	* ( ) - Combine with AF		* ( ) - Combine with AF

	[[Category:~~Old Proposals~~]]		[[Category:Club Expansion]]

RS David: Category:Old Proposals

2009-02-05T19:05:22Z

Category:Old Proposals

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:05, 5 February 2009
Line 131:		Line 131:
	* ( ) - Make separate fleet (unit)		* ( ) - Make separate fleet (unit)
	* ( ) - Combine with AF		* ( ) - Combine with AF

			[[Category:Old Proposals]]

Licah Fox: not current

2006-02-07T21:21:54Z

not current

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 7 February 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
			'''Note: This page is from October 2004, and does not represent the current (February 2006) structure changes proposal.''' That proposal involves only the flying fleets; contact [[Joshua Hawkins]] or [[Himm El-Syna]] for more information.


	[[High Command]] is discussing major changes to the Rebel Squadrons structure. These changes would affect every RSer, so great care is being taken to ensure that these changes will benefit the RS as much as possible.		[[High Command]] is discussing major changes to the Rebel Squadrons structure. These changes would affect every RSer, so great care is being taken to ensure that these changes will benefit the RS as much as possible.

Licah Fox: /* FPS/strategy games */ blasts' e-mail

2004-10-30T21:53:12Z

FPS/strategy games: blasts' e-mail

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 30 October 2004
Line 53:		Line 53:
	* Monopoly		* Monopoly

			From Blasts' e-mail:
			<pre>
			RSCD Fleet Staff
			CO
			XO
			SO
			IO
			TO (trainin Officer)

			The persons Main Platoon (Wing)
			Platoon Structures as follows
			Knight = JK series
			Paladin = BattleFront
			Placeholder = Strategy based games
			Katarns = Republic Commando, the whole fleet will be picking up writing.
			</pre>

			"Now, there will be a head for each game, this person will maintain the CO position for each wing that has the game, unless Snap wants to add in a Division CO position. I dont care either way. All the Wing CO's, and the RSCD CS have a council in which we discuss things, its so far proven effecient. Fact is gentleman, I already have a superfleet, I dont think there is much to change at this point."

	==Fiction/roleplaying units==		==Fiction/roleplaying units==

Licah Fox: /* Poll */ fleet merit clarification

2004-10-30T21:49:25Z

Poll: fleet merit clarification

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:49, 30 October 2004
Line 101:		Line 101:
	* ( ) Combine "close" games (PBF/R2F, RgF/IBG]		* ( ) Combine "close" games (PBF/R2F, RgF/IBG]
	* Combine all games and squadrons (PBF/R2F/RgF/IBG), use same storyline:		* Combine all games and squadrons (PBF/R2F/RgF/IBG), use same storyline:
	* ( ) - Start anew, have squadrons compete on participation, keep ~~old~~ fleet ~~things as above~~		* ( ) - Start anew, have squadrons compete on participation, keep fleet merits running
	* ( ) - Start anew as above, ~~but~~ retire ~~the old~~ fleet ~~things~~, ~~making~~ focus on new system		* ( ) - Start anew as above, retire fleet merits, make focus on new system

Ray Djo: poll

2004-10-29T05:09:15Z

poll

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 29 October 2004
Line 89:		Line 89:

	The changes to High Command are not fully explored yet, and more effort should be done to study the different possibilities.		The changes to High Command are not fully explored yet, and more effort should be done to study the different possibilities.


			== Poll ==

			This is what the poll that will be sent to the membership will look like, along with links to more in-depth analysis of each option.

			Please vote once for the flying units and once for RF.

			Flying units:
			* ( ) No change
			* ( ) Combine "close" games (PBF/R2F, RgF/IBG]
			* Combine all games and squadrons (PBF/R2F/RgF/IBG), use same storyline:
			* ( ) - Start anew, have squadrons compete on participation, keep old fleet things as above
			* ( ) - Start anew as above, but retire the old fleet things, making focus on new system


			RF:
			* ( ) No change
			* Retire fleet, move STC/SWAT to RSCD, ABG:
			* ( ) - Make separate fleet (unit)
			* ( ) - Combine with AF

Licah Fox: /* Proportional votes */ added 'nother plan

2004-10-28T14:33:41Z

Proportional votes: added 'nother plan

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:33, 28 October 2004
Line 73:		Line 73:
	* 3 votes - flying unit CO, 2 others appointed by FC & CO		* 3 votes - flying unit CO, 2 others appointed by FC & CO
	* 2 votes - FPS/strategy CO, 1 other appointed		* 2 votes - FPS/strategy CO, 1 other appointed

			'''Another possible current setup''' with fewer total votes:
			* 1 vote - Allegiance BG CO
			* 1 vote - Aurora Force CO
			* 1 vote - Vanguard CO
			* 2 votes - flying unit CO, XO (or most senior game officer)
			* 1 votes - FPS/strategy CO

	'''Another possible current setup''' based tightly on membership numbers:		'''Another possible current setup''' based tightly on membership numbers:

Licah Fox: /* Fiction units */ VF, small changes

2004-10-28T03:02:32Z

Fiction units: VF, small changes

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:02, 28 October 2004
Line 54:		Line 54:


	==Fiction units==		==Fiction/roleplaying units==

			* MMORPG, Vanguard Fleet
	* Roleplaying, d6, Allegiance Battle Group		* Roleplaying, d6, Allegiance Battle Group
	* Writing, Aurora Force		* Writing, Aurora Force

	As these units do not wish to combine, they may be autonomous, answering directly in the same way as the FPS/strategy and flying units.		As these units do not wish to combine, and likely would not benefit from such a combination, they may be autonomous, answering directly in the same way as the FPS/strategy and flying units might.


	==High Command==		==High Command==

Licah Fox: Non-flying units, high command

2004-10-28T03:01:01Z

Non-flying units, high command

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:01, 28 October 2004
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* Combining fleets in to a "superfleet" that continues to keep each fleet separate, but with the same storyline		* Combining fleets in to a "superfleet" that continues to keep each fleet separate, but with the same storyline
	* Change little or nothing		* Change little or nothing


			==FPS/strategy games==

			Combined into one unit that contains the following games:
			* Battlefront
			* Galactic Battlegrounds
			* Force Commander
			* Rebellion
			* StarCraft
			* Jedi Academy
			* Jedi Outcast
			* Jedi Knight
			* Dark Forces
			* Monopoly


			==Fiction units==

			* Roleplaying, d6, Allegiance Battle Group
			* Writing, Aurora Force

			As these units do not wish to combine, they may be autonomous, answering directly in the same way as the FPS/strategy and flying units.


			==High Command==
			The combined structure of units will make the system of the current High Command obsolete. A number of options exist to replace this.

			===Proportional votes=== - Each unit will get a number of votes proportional to its size in the Rebel Squadrons; however, ''no person may hold more than one vote''. A unit that has multiple votes must distribute those votes throughout its command staff, in a manner which must be approved by the Fleet Commander and the unit CO. Autonomous units should receive at least one vote if they have at least 20 people.

			'''A possible current setup''' based on relative importance:
			* 1 vote - Allegiance BG CO
			* 1 vote - Aurora Force CO
			* 1 vote - Vanguard CO
			* 3 votes - flying unit CO, 2 others appointed by FC & CO
			* 2 votes - FPS/strategy CO, 1 other appointed

			'''Another possible current setup''' based tightly on membership numbers:
			* 1 vote - Allegiance BG CO
			* 2 votes - Aurora Force CO, 1 other decided on by FC and CO (possibly XO)
			* 2 votes - Vanguard CO, 1 other (possibly XO)
			* 5 votes - Flying unit CO, 4 others (possibly XW/TIE/XvT/XWA officers)
			* 3 votes - FPS/strategy CO, 2 others (possibly FPS/strategy officers)

			The changes to High Command are not fully explored yet, and more effort should be done to study the different possibilities.