Talk:Beginner's Path - Revision history

Licah Fox: automated points

2007-07-27T03:06:47Z

automated points

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:06, 27 July 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	the above post is PM, by the way. Still need to create a user: ! --[[Petr Margul]] 11 January 2007		the above post is PM, by the way. Still need to create a user: ! --[[Petr Margul]] 11 January 2007

			== automated points ==

			It is possible to easily add automated points for any page on the main RS domain (www.rebelsquadrons.org/anything). Subdomains are negotiable. [[User:Licah Fox\|Licah]] 23:06, 26 July 2007 (EDT)

Licah Fox: attributions

2007-07-27T03:03:52Z

attributions

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:03, 27 July 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I like it. Gives folks something they can do on their own and makes sure they are familiar with the RS website.		I like it. Gives folks something they can do on their own and makes sure they are familiar with the RS website. -[[Spokes]] 1 March 2006

	From [[Indy]]:		From [[Indy]]:
	We definately need to make some things fleet specific, though. I don't care of an AF Cadet can use XFire. That has no relevance to my fleet, so I don't think someone in AF who has that as their only game should get points for adding Spokes to XFire. There are things on that list that don't necessarily apply across the board to all fleets -- I don't see a reason for PBF folks to have XFire, either, so it's not just me.		We definately need to make some things fleet specific, though. I don't care of an AF Cadet can use XFire. That has no relevance to my fleet, so I don't think someone in AF who has that as their only game should get points for adding Spokes to XFire. There are things on that list that don't necessarily apply across the board to all fleets -- I don't see a reason for PBF folks to have XFire, either, so it's not just me. -[[Indy]] 4 May 2006

	EK, I figure since this is your bailiwick now, this page will get all fine-tuned and revamped. Look forward to seeing your ideas man! As for Indy's concern... I see your point, and it's very valid. However, I think that it sort of muddles the intent of the Beginner's Path. It's designed to be a general orientation to the RS. True, as an AFer (but as a PBFer, I can see use for XFire) you may not need nor want XFire. But what if, like many of our members, you belong to more than one fleet, the majority of which do prefer use of XFire. Or, should you choose to join a fleet later. Bam, you've already learned how to do it. If this was a task that was somewhat arduous or otherwise, then I'd agree with you. But I think the 30 seconds or so it requires to get a point on the Beginner's Path for this task is a very fair bargain, and will be useful as I think more of our members will utilize XFire at least once in their career than not.		EK, I figure since this is your bailiwick now, this page will get all fine-tuned and revamped. Look forward to seeing your ideas man! As for Indy's concern... I see your point, and it's very valid. However, I think that it sort of muddles the intent of the Beginner's Path. It's designed to be a general orientation to the RS. True, as an AFer (but as a PBFer, I can see use for XFire) you may not need nor want XFire. But what if, like many of our members, you belong to more than one fleet, the majority of which do prefer use of XFire. Or, should you choose to join a fleet later. Bam, you've already learned how to do it. If this was a task that was somewhat arduous or otherwise, then I'd agree with you. But I think the 30 seconds or so it requires to get a point on the Beginner's Path for this task is a very fair bargain, and will be useful as I think more of our members will utilize XFire at least once in their career than not.

	the above post is PM, by the way. Still need to create a user: !		the above post is PM, by the way. Still need to create a user: ! --[[Petr Margul]] 11 January 2007

Ray Djo at 19:48, 11 January 2007

2007-01-11T19:48:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 11 January 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:

	EK, I figure since this is your bailiwick now, this page will get all fine-tuned and revamped. Look forward to seeing your ideas man! As for Indy's concern... I see your point, and it's very valid. However, I think that it sort of muddles the intent of the Beginner's Path. It's designed to be a general orientation to the RS. True, as an AFer (but as a PBFer, I can see use for XFire) you may not need nor want XFire. But what if, like many of our members, you belong to more than one fleet, the majority of which do prefer use of XFire. Or, should you choose to join a fleet later. Bam, you've already learned how to do it. If this was a task that was somewhat arduous or otherwise, then I'd agree with you. But I think the 30 seconds or so it requires to get a point on the Beginner's Path for this task is a very fair bargain, and will be useful as I think more of our members will utilize XFire at least once in their career than not.		EK, I figure since this is your bailiwick now, this page will get all fine-tuned and revamped. Look forward to seeing your ideas man! As for Indy's concern... I see your point, and it's very valid. However, I think that it sort of muddles the intent of the Beginner's Path. It's designed to be a general orientation to the RS. True, as an AFer (but as a PBFer, I can see use for XFire) you may not need nor want XFire. But what if, like many of our members, you belong to more than one fleet, the majority of which do prefer use of XFire. Or, should you choose to join a fleet later. Bam, you've already learned how to do it. If this was a task that was somewhat arduous or otherwise, then I'd agree with you. But I think the 30 seconds or so it requires to get a point on the Beginner's Path for this task is a very fair bargain, and will be useful as I think more of our members will utilize XFire at least once in their career than not.

			the above post is PM, by the way. Still need to create a user: !

Ray Djo at 19:47, 11 January 2007

2007-01-11T19:47:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 11 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	From [[Indy]]:		From [[Indy]]:
	We definately need to make some things fleet specific, though. I don't care of an AF Cadet can use XFire. That has no relevance to my fleet, so I don't think someone in AF who has that as their only game should get points for adding Spokes to XFire. There are things on that list that don't necessarily apply across the board to all fleets -- I don't see a reason for PBF folks to have XFire, either, so it's not just me.		We definately need to make some things fleet specific, though. I don't care of an AF Cadet can use XFire. That has no relevance to my fleet, so I don't think someone in AF who has that as their only game should get points for adding Spokes to XFire. There are things on that list that don't necessarily apply across the board to all fleets -- I don't see a reason for PBF folks to have XFire, either, so it's not just me.

			EK, I figure since this is your bailiwick now, this page will get all fine-tuned and revamped. Look forward to seeing your ideas man! As for Indy's concern... I see your point, and it's very valid. However, I think that it sort of muddles the intent of the Beginner's Path. It's designed to be a general orientation to the RS. True, as an AFer (but as a PBFer, I can see use for XFire) you may not need nor want XFire. But what if, like many of our members, you belong to more than one fleet, the majority of which do prefer use of XFire. Or, should you choose to join a fleet later. Bam, you've already learned how to do it. If this was a task that was somewhat arduous or otherwise, then I'd agree with you. But I think the 30 seconds or so it requires to get a point on the Beginner's Path for this task is a very fair bargain, and will be useful as I think more of our members will utilize XFire at least once in their career than not.

Indy at 14:32, 4 May 2006

2006-05-04T14:32:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:32, 4 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I like it. Gives folks something they can do on their own and makes sure they are familiar with the RS website.		I like it. Gives folks something they can do on their own and makes sure they are familiar with the RS website.

			From [[Indy]]:
	We definately need to make some things fleet specific, though. I don't care of an AF Cadet can use XFire. That has no relevance to my fleet, so I don't think someone in AF who has that as their only game should get points for adding Spokes to XFire. There are things on that list that don't necessarily apply across the board to all fleets -- I don't see a reason for PBF folks to have XFire, either, so it's not just me.		We definately need to make some things fleet specific, though. I don't care of an AF Cadet can use XFire. That has no relevance to my fleet, so I don't think someone in AF who has that as their only game should get points for adding Spokes to XFire. There are things on that list that don't necessarily apply across the board to all fleets -- I don't see a reason for PBF folks to have XFire, either, so it's not just me.

Indy at 14:31, 4 May 2006

2006-05-04T14:31:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:31, 4 May 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I like it. Gives folks something they can do on their own and makes sure they are familiar with the RS website.		I like it. Gives folks something they can do on their own and makes sure they are familiar with the RS website.

			We definately need to make some things fleet specific, though. I don't care of an AF Cadet can use XFire. That has no relevance to my fleet, so I don't think someone in AF who has that as their only game should get points for adding Spokes to XFire. There are things on that list that don't necessarily apply across the board to all fleets -- I don't see a reason for PBF folks to have XFire, either, so it's not just me.

Spokes: i like it

2006-03-01T04:44:49Z

i like it

New page

I like it. Gives folks something they can do on their own and makes sure they are familiar with the RS website.