Talk:Medals - Revision history

Adam Mieter: /* color code no longer needed */

2012-07-30T04:03:52Z

color code no longer needed

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:03, 30 July 2012
Line 23:		Line 23:
	== color code no longer needed ==		== color code no longer needed ==

	<del>The names of the medals in color are no longer needed. I'll standardize it when I have the time, but anyone else can help too. ~~<span style="color:Purple">â€”</span> '''~~[[User:Fcsuper\|<span style="color:#006699">f</span><span style="color:#6666FF">c</span><span style="color:#666699">s</span><span style="color:#336633">u</span><span style="color:#006699">p</span><span style="color:#6633FF">e</span><span style="color:#9966FF">r</span>]]'''<sup> ([[User talk:Fcsuper\|<span style="color:Olive">What?</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Fcsuper\|<span style="color:Teal">Where!</span>]])</sup> <sub>([http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Inclusionism <span style="color:Maroon">Inclusionistic</span>] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism <span style="color:Red">Eventualist</span>] ) </sub><span style="color:Purple">â€”</span> 01:47, 28 March 2009 (EDT)</del> [[Adam Mieter]] 11:59, 29 July 2012		<del>The names of the medals in color are no longer needed. I'll standardize it when I have the time, but anyone else can help too. [[Super]] 01:47, 28 March 2009 (EDT)</del> [[Adam Mieter]] 11:59, 29 July 2012

Adam Mieter: Updated.

2012-07-30T04:01:39Z

Updated.

Fcsuper: New section: color code no longer needed

2009-03-28T05:47:47Z

New section: color code no longer needed

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:47, 28 March 2009
Line 20:		Line 20:

	There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article. Please review the article and remove those sections. For example, there is discussion able what should be changed in the bylaws. This should be implemented or not, but either way, it should be rv from the article itself. --[[User:Fcsuper\|Fcsuper]] 10:44, 6 July 2008 (EDT)		There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article. Please review the article and remove those sections. For example, there is discussion able what should be changed in the bylaws. This should be implemented or not, but either way, it should be rv from the article itself. --[[User:Fcsuper\|Fcsuper]] 10:44, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

			== color code no longer needed ==

			The names of the medals in color are no longer needed. I'll standardize it when I have the time, but anyone else can help too. <span style="color:Purple">â€”</span> '''[[User:Fcsuper\|<span style="color:#006699">f</span><span style="color:#6666FF">c</span><span style="color:#666699">s</span><span style="color:#336633">u</span><span style="color:#006699">p</span><span style="color:#6633FF">e</span><span style="color:#9966FF">r</span>]]'''<sup> ([[User talk:Fcsuper\|<span style="color:Olive">What?</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Fcsuper\|<span style="color:Teal">Where!</span>]])</sup> <sub>([http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Inclusionism <span style="color:Maroon">Inclusionistic</span>] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism <span style="color:Red">Eventualist</span>] ) </sub><span style="color:Purple">â€”</span> 01:47, 28 March 2009 (EDT)

Fcsuper: /* There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article */ what's in a name

2008-07-06T14:44:47Z

There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article: what's in a name

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 6 July 2008
Line 19:		Line 19:
	== There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article ==		== There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article ==

	There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article. Please review the article and remove those sections. For example, there is discussion able what should be changed in the bylaws. This should be implemented or not, but either way, it should be rv from the article itself.		There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article. Please review the article and remove those sections. For example, there is discussion able what should be changed in the bylaws. This should be implemented or not, but either way, it should be rv from the article itself. --[[User:Fcsuper\|Fcsuper]] 10:44, 6 July 2008 (EDT)

Fcsuper: New section: There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article

2008-07-06T14:44:26Z

New section: There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 6 July 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Just a suggestion to relabel "New Proposal" as something that suggests this has been implemented. [[User:Fcsuper\|Fcsuper]] 20:51, 12 June 2007 (EDT)		Just a suggestion to relabel "New Proposal" as something that suggests this has been implemented. [[User:Fcsuper\|Fcsuper]] 20:51, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

			== There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article ==

			There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article. Please review the article and remove those sections. For example, there is discussion able what should be changed in the bylaws. This should be implemented or not, but either way, it should be rv from the article itself.

Fcsuper: relabel

2007-06-13T00:51:22Z

relabel

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:51, 13 June 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:

	----		----

			== relabel ==

			Just a suggestion to relabel "New Proposal" as something that suggests this has been implemented. [[User:Fcsuper\|Fcsuper]] 20:51, 12 June 2007 (EDT)

Rekio at 12:06, 24 September 2006

2006-09-24T12:06:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:06, 24 September 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* Violet Cluster should not be retired because it is a "fun" medal.		* Violet Cluster should not be retired because it is a "fun" medal.
	* Alvace Star and Burdine Cluster should be replaced with names more relevant to the RS.		* Alvace Star and Burdine Cluster should be replaced with names more relevant to the RS.
	* MP Combat medals guidelines - should they be a daily averages or weekly total? should this include internal or just be for external competitions?		* MP Combat medals guidelines - should they be a daily averages or weekly total? should this include internal or just be for external competitions? should MP medals be recommended by the OO or MO?


	----		----

Rekio at 07:41, 24 September 2006

2006-09-24T07:41:13Z

Show changes

Licah Fox: updates

2006-09-17T01:52:09Z

updates

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:52, 17 September 2006
Line 422:		Line 422:

	Super		Super

			== updates ==

			Hey,
			* Can someone archive most of this talk page? I'm not sure it all needs to be here; move the inactive discussions to an old page, such as "Talk:Medals/archive", a la Wikipedia.
			* We'll probably be enacting this medals stuff next week, perhaps even before the SotRS, which will be released Tuesday. We can continue to tweak the system after we're done.
			* I don't really like "Level 0", can we just bump everything else up one level, with the new max being 10? It just seems like level 0 wouldn't actually be a medal.
			-[[User:Licah Fox\|Licah Fox]] 21:52, 16 September 2006 (EDT)

Fcsuper: /* Detail on MP medals */

2006-09-14T22:22:16Z

Detail on MP medals

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 14 September 2006
Line 411:		Line 411:

	Himm		Himm

			----
			Himm,

			I don't see why we couldn't include internal events into the MP system. I tried to leave the wording as general as possible to allow for such events.

			This system will work for any game and gameplay type for which there are online competitions of 3 days or longer (perhaps limited to 30 day). The more popular the game, the more chance there is at the higher medals. This is simply reality. What I've said before, not everyone in the US Armed forces has the opportunity to get a Congressional Medal of Honor. They are pretty much impossible to get in peacetime. :) It should be noted that even if a game is popular, it doesn't mean people will be magically fulfilling these requirements. I mean, playing 14 hours and maintaining a win ratio is very hard work, but it is being done by some right now. Myself played 13 hours worth of game time in the recent Conquest Week on ER, though I didn't have the necessary victory ratio. We can only go so far to balance the rewarding participation on newer games vs. older games. Maybe we can use Fleet medals to cover any preceived gaps.

			The current limitation on these medals is whether or not the event is "ongoing". Ladders and weekly regular events would still hafta be covered by Fleet Medals only since these are ongoing in some fashion. Is the LIC an ongoing event, or does it consist of discreet events?

			Super

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:01, 30 July 2012
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Recent topics of discussion:		Recent topics of discussion:

	* Fleets medals should be standardized and consolidated into fleet medals where possible.		* <del>Fleets medals should be standardized and consolidated into fleet medals where possible.</del> [[Adam Mieter]] 11:56, 29 July 2012
	* Commendation medals are too specific.		* <del>Commendation medals are too specific.</del> - They seem to be general enough. [[Adam Mieter]] 11:56, 29 July 2012
	* Violet Cluster should not be retired because it is a "fun" medal.		* <del>Violet Cluster should not be retired because it is a "fun" medal.</del>
	* Alvace Star and Burdine Cluster should be replaced with names more relevant to the RS.		* <del>Alvace Star and Burdine Cluster should be replaced with names more relevant to the RS.</del> - I think they have nice names and I've heard no complaints so far. [[Adam Mieter]] 11:57, 29 July 2012
	* MP Combat medals guidelines - should they be a daily averages or weekly total? should this include internal or just be for external competitions? should MP medals be recommended by the OO or MO?		* MP Combat medals guidelines - should they be a daily averages or weekly total? should this include internal or just be for external competitions? should MP medals be recommended by the OO or MO?

Line 15:		Line 15:
	== relabel ==		== relabel ==

	Just a suggestion to relabel "New Proposal" as something that suggests this has been implemented. [[User:Fcsuper\|Fcsuper]] 20:51, 12 June 2007 (EDT)		<del>Just a suggestion to relabel "New Proposal" as something that suggests this has been implemented. [[User:Fcsuper\|Fcsuper]] 20:51, 12 June 2007 (EDT)</del> [[Adam Mieter]] 11:56, 29 July 2012

	== There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article ==		== There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article ==

	There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article. Please review the article and remove those sections. For example, there is discussion able what should be changed in the bylaws. This should be implemented or not, but either way, it should be rv from the article itself. --[[User:Fcsuper\|Fcsuper]] 10:44, 6 July 2008 (EDT)		<del>There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article. Please review the article and remove those sections. For example, there is discussion able what should be changed in the bylaws. This should be implemented or not, but either way, it should be rv from the article itself. --[[User:Fcsuper\|Fcsuper]] 10:44, 6 July 2008 (EDT)</del> [[Adam Mieter]] 11:56, 29 July 2012

	== color code no longer needed ==		== color code no longer needed ==

	The names of the medals in color are no longer needed. I'll standardize it when I have the time, but anyone else can help too. <span style="color:Purple">â€”</span> '''[[User:Fcsuper\|<span style="color:#006699">f</span><span style="color:#6666FF">c</span><span style="color:#666699">s</span><span style="color:#336633">u</span><span style="color:#006699">p</span><span style="color:#6633FF">e</span><span style="color:#9966FF">r</span>]]'''<sup> ([[User talk:Fcsuper\|<span style="color:Olive">What?</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Fcsuper\|<span style="color:Teal">Where!</span>]])</sup> <sub>([http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Inclusionism <span style="color:Maroon">Inclusionistic</span>] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism <span style="color:Red">Eventualist</span>] ) </sub><span style="color:Purple">â€”</span> 01:47, 28 March 2009 (EDT)		<del>The names of the medals in color are no longer needed. I'll standardize it when I have the time, but anyone else can help too. <span style="color:Purple">â€”</span> '''[[User:Fcsuper\|<span style="color:#006699">f</span><span style="color:#6666FF">c</span><span style="color:#666699">s</span><span style="color:#336633">u</span><span style="color:#006699">p</span><span style="color:#6633FF">e</span><span style="color:#9966FF">r</span>]]'''<sup> ([[User talk:Fcsuper\|<span style="color:Olive">What?</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Fcsuper\|<span style="color:Teal">Where!</span>]])</sup> <sub>([http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Inclusionism <span style="color:Maroon">Inclusionistic</span>] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism <span style="color:Red">Eventualist</span>] ) </sub><span style="color:Purple">â€”</span> 01:47, 28 March 2009 (EDT)</del> [[Adam Mieter]] 11:59, 29 July 2012