Talk:Vigilance Starfighter Group - Revision history

David Vaughan: Talk:Vigilance Strike Fleet moved to Talk:Vigilance Starfighter Group

2006-10-15T14:08:46Z

Talk:Vigilance Strike Fleet moved to Talk:Vigilance Starfighter Group

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:08, 15 October 2006
(No difference)

Ray Djo: /* Merits */

2006-08-17T20:30:44Z

Merits

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 ":)<br />
 Hi folks, I'm going to Be Bold and use the participation merit system I once proposed at [[Common ITOD]] as the basis of our new combined fleet, since we don't really have a proposal yet for squadron competition... -[[User:Licah Fox|Licah Fox]] 14:43, 9 August 2006 (EDT)
 == Yeah, merits once more ==

Ray Djo: Yeah, merits once more

2006-08-17T20:30:27Z

Yeah, merits once more

@@ Line 55: / Line 55: @@
 ":)<br />
 Hi folks, I'm going to Be Bold and use the participation merit system I once proposed at [[Common ITOD]] as the basis of our new combined fleet, since we don't really have a proposal yet for squadron competition... -[[User:Licah Fox|Licah Fox]] 14:43, 9 August 2006 (EDT)
 More on merit points

Ray Djo at 20:30, 17 August 2006

2006-08-17T20:30:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 17 August 2006
Line 55:		Line 55:
	":)<br />		":)<br />
	Hi folks, I'm going to Be Bold and use the participation merit system I once proposed at [[Common ITOD]] as the basis of our new combined fleet, since we don't really have a proposal yet for squadron competition... -[[User:Licah Fox\|Licah Fox]] 14:43, 9 August 2006 (EDT)		Hi folks, I'm going to Be Bold and use the participation merit system I once proposed at [[Common ITOD]] as the basis of our new combined fleet, since we don't really have a proposal yet for squadron competition... -[[User:Licah Fox\|Licah Fox]] 14:43, 9 August 2006 (EDT)

			More on merit points

			Sorry for picking on what seems like details, but this:

			- first, I don't see any need to have limitations on the historical mission merits. We only have a limited number of old missions anyway, and if a pilot wants do to them all in one weekend, then let him. The available number of missions will increase over time, but we can all fly and report on those missions we didn't report in on when they was "live". I see absolutely no reason for this limitation.

			- second, I strongly disagree on the suggestion for MP. If we're going to let LIC be the basis for the MP activity in the new fleet, it will require a different merit system for this. I see no reason not to use LIC; if the missing racing option in XvT is seen as a big hinderance, then let's go back to focusing solely on Domination League (I will see this as a big loss for the XWA pilots, though). The system of one point per match played is no good; this way a couple of pilots can easily spend a sunday night and win lots of points. This happened in the old IBG system. LIC is similar to the TOD, and ought to be similar in the way we win merit points. Just take the existing system and blow up the points to match the rest of the system.

			- third, I think the number of points for the mission makers is far to low. I don't say this because I'm a mission maker myself, but at least the way we do this in the IBG, the mission maker is expected to be moderate when it comes to actually flying the mission, thus limiting his chance of earning points that way. Also, making missions for XWA is rather time consuming, and ought to be payd better. I also think we should give merits to the mission tester; if done right, the testing is quite some job.

			- fourth, we should have a way for the IO people to earn points for their job. Where would we be without them?

			Himm

Licah Fox: Merits

2006-08-09T18:43:15Z

Merits

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:43, 9 August 2006
Line 50:		Line 50:

	Himm		Himm

			== Merits ==

			":)<br />
			Hi folks, I'm going to Be Bold and use the participation merit system I once proposed at [[Common ITOD]] as the basis of our new combined fleet, since we don't really have a proposal yet for squadron competition... -[[User:Licah Fox\|Licah Fox]] 14:43, 9 August 2006 (EDT)

Ray Djo: Medals

2006-08-06T23:03:58Z

Medals

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, 6 August 2006
Line 38:		Line 38:

	Hehe, finally. I've been knocked in the head many, many times when I said the Wings ought to die, so I'm now dancing joyfully when I see this is going to happen :) Very good.		Hehe, finally. I've been knocked in the head many, many times when I said the Wings ought to die, so I'm now dancing joyfully when I see this is going to happen :) Very good.

			Himm

			== Medals ==

			I'd suggest we take the current medals, then see which ones we can transfer over and which ones not, then rename them as needed.

			As for LIC medals, please note we have separate sets for DL and SCL.

			For Tour Champion, this is an RS wide medal and already exists, so no need to make this one.

	Himm		Himm

David Vaughan: /* Flying Proposal */

2006-08-06T11:04:31Z

Flying Proposal

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:04, 6 August 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:
	If we could get pilots to fly once, give a brief report on what happened (fail, pass, brief description of what happened, who died, etc.), then let them refly ''ad infinitum'' to get the best score before the deadline.		If we could get pilots to fly once, give a brief report on what happened (fail, pass, brief description of what happened, who died, etc.), then let them refly ''ad infinitum'' to get the best score before the deadline.

	This would help us actually have things ''happen'', since even the most ace pilots would screw up every now and again, which from a storyline perspective, is far more satisying than 'win, win, win, win, win . . . '		This would help us actually have things ''happen'', since even the most ace pilots would screw up every now and again, which from a storyline perspective, is far more satisying than 'win, win, win, win, win . . . ' --Cmdr. [[User:David Vaughan\|David Vaughan]] 06:19, 6 August 2006 (EDT)

	:~~Cmdr~~. ~~[[User~~:~~David Vaughan\|David Vaughan]] 06:19~~, ~~6 August 2006 (EDT)~~		:In a way I support this, but this would inevitably lead to the fleet being destroyed and annihilated.
			:There are missions that almost noone completes on the first run, and then what? Ooops, suddenly all that is left of our fleet is Richo and Spokes...But as a general idea, I support it.

	In a way I support this, but this would inevitably lead to the fleet being destroyed and annihilated. There are missions that almost noone completes on the first run, and then what? Ooops, suddenly all that is left of our fleet is Richo and Spokes...But as a general idea, I support it.		:Himm

	~~Himm~~		::Hmm . . . I'm sure that we could do it in such a way that we wouldn't lose ships all the time. Obviously we would have to temper mission planning to take into consideration the fact that we don't necessarily want to lose all our ships . . .
			::It has worked before with other flight fleets in the past . . . it's merely a tradition that has been lost over time (mostly due to a lack of mission builders with enough time to make a fully interactive TOD . . .).
			::I feel that we could plan ways for this to happen . . . especially since a ship is not officially lost unless at least half of the fleet lose it in their run through the mission. --Cmdr. [[User:David Vaughan\|David Vaughan]] 07:04, 6 August 2006 (EDT)

	== Wings ==		== Wings ==

Ray Djo: /* Flying Proposal */

2006-08-06T10:37:57Z

Flying Proposal

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:37, 6 August 2006
Line 27:		Line 27:

	:Cmdr. [[User:David Vaughan\|David Vaughan]] 06:19, 6 August 2006 (EDT)		:Cmdr. [[User:David Vaughan\|David Vaughan]] 06:19, 6 August 2006 (EDT)

			In a way I support this, but this would inevitably lead to the fleet being destroyed and annihilated. There are missions that almost noone completes on the first run, and then what? Ooops, suddenly all that is left of our fleet is Richo and Spokes...But as a general idea, I support it.

			Himm

	== Wings ==		== Wings ==

Ray Djo: /* Wings */

2006-08-06T10:19:53Z

Wings

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:19, 6 August 2006
Line 30:		Line 30:
	== Wings ==		== Wings ==

	Hehe, ~~fianlly~~. I've been knocked in the head many, many times when I said the Wings ought to die, so I'm now dancing joyfully when I see this is going to happen :) Very good.		Hehe, finally. I've been knocked in the head many, many times when I said the Wings ought to die, so I'm now dancing joyfully when I see this is going to happen :) Very good.

	Himm		Himm

Ray Djo: Wings

2006-08-06T10:19:35Z

Wings

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:19, 6 August 2006
Line 27:		Line 27:

	:Cmdr. [[User:David Vaughan\|David Vaughan]] 06:19, 6 August 2006 (EDT)		:Cmdr. [[User:David Vaughan\|David Vaughan]] 06:19, 6 August 2006 (EDT)

			== Wings ==

			Hehe, fianlly. I've been knocked in the head many, many times when I said the Wings ought to die, so I'm now dancing joyfully when I see this is going to happen :) Very good.

			Himm