Talk:Academy proposal

Proposal 1, I have an issue with. I do not want my fleet academy under the control/observation of the RSTO. I've appointed people who work great with the cadets. Should one of them not wish to do it anymore, I want to be able to go ahead and replace them immediately. I dont' think the RSTO fits anywhere in that equation.

Do you disagree with observation or just control? I'd really like some way to know if TOs are operating correctly, for one. This doesn't mean the TO controls who you replace, just advises who is doing the best job or not. (Our current TO probably wouldn't even go that far.) Licah Fox 21:42, 20 July 2006 (EDT)

Proposal 3 sounds very nice, and if done right could work very well, but you are correct PBF and other flight sims would get hurt because very few people would sign up for them. we basically have 3 areas for games, Flight Sims, First person games, and EaW (Erm strategy). Having a centralized academy in this case wouldn't be worth while. If we do then the flight sims go down the tank because of the newer games out.

Just my two credits.

Joshua Hawkins 19:38, 20 July 2006 (EDT)