Talk:Primary instructors: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
and another request for Licah |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:: That would be awesome if the automated emails will generate the Primary Instructors name. This leads me to another issue we need to solve beforehand - we have three PIs now, with more to be eventually added, how are we going to deal with this? Putting the PIs on a list the system would circle through would be one solution. Another solution would be to have all PIs names and emails listed in the 1st automated email. Another solution, which I would actually see as most useful, would be if we (me and PI CO) would be able to mark a PI as "PI On Duty". The system would then pick the "PI On Duty" as contact person for the automated emails. What do you say? [[User:DaLe|DaLe]] 07:35, 27 July 2007 (EDT) | :: That would be awesome if the automated emails will generate the Primary Instructors name. This leads me to another issue we need to solve beforehand - we have three PIs now, with more to be eventually added, how are we going to deal with this? Putting the PIs on a list the system would circle through would be one solution. Another solution would be to have all PIs names and emails listed in the 1st automated email. Another solution, which I would actually see as most useful, would be if we (me and PI CO) would be able to mark a PI as "PI On Duty". The system would then pick the "PI On Duty" as contact person for the automated emails. What do you say? [[User:DaLe|DaLe]] 07:35, 27 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
::: I can do it so that you choose the PI "on duty" for any new members, or I can have the system automatically assign new members to the PI with the fewest cadets. It's really up to you. :) [[User:Licah Fox|Licah]] 20:31, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | ::: I can do it so that you choose the PI "on duty" for any new members, or I can have the system automatically assign new members to the PI with the fewest cadets. It's really up to you. :) [[User:Licah Fox|Licah]] 20:31, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | ||
:::: Nice. Hmm, I think I'll prefer to be able to pick the PIoD manually, but I would actually have one more request with this. Would it be possible to add a "timetable" to the PIoD adminstration, so that I could specify who is going to be PIoD in which periods for like 2 weeks in advance? (eg. PI Bob would be PIoD from 1st 01:00 am EST to 3rd 03:00 am, PI Ted from 3rd 03:01 am to ..., etc.) The main idea behind this is that once there will be more PIs I want the PICO to make a PI availability schedule in advance to ensure that a PI (=PIoD) will get in touch with a new member within 1 - 2 hours (if it is not early morning) instead of 12+ hours. [[User:DaLe|DaLe]] 21:07, 31 July 2007 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 01:07, 1 August 2007
It has been mentioned in the original proposal that step 2 includes that the Primary Instructor's name would show up in the automated emails. Is something like that still possible? DaLe 20:36, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
- Yes sir :P Is this proposal actually active now? Licah 23:01, 26 July 2007 (EDT)
- Check the exec roster and the RSA roster. It is not a proposal anymore, but it is not fully active now. I need to fine-tune things a bit before I 'unleash' the PIs on the new members. The Primary Instructors are basically going to be the adminstrators and supervisors of the BP.
- That would be awesome if the automated emails will generate the Primary Instructors name. This leads me to another issue we need to solve beforehand - we have three PIs now, with more to be eventually added, how are we going to deal with this? Putting the PIs on a list the system would circle through would be one solution. Another solution would be to have all PIs names and emails listed in the 1st automated email. Another solution, which I would actually see as most useful, would be if we (me and PI CO) would be able to mark a PI as "PI On Duty". The system would then pick the "PI On Duty" as contact person for the automated emails. What do you say? DaLe 07:35, 27 July 2007 (EDT)
- I can do it so that you choose the PI "on duty" for any new members, or I can have the system automatically assign new members to the PI with the fewest cadets. It's really up to you. :) Licah 20:31, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
- Nice. Hmm, I think I'll prefer to be able to pick the PIoD manually, but I would actually have one more request with this. Would it be possible to add a "timetable" to the PIoD adminstration, so that I could specify who is going to be PIoD in which periods for like 2 weeks in advance? (eg. PI Bob would be PIoD from 1st 01:00 am EST to 3rd 03:00 am, PI Ted from 3rd 03:01 am to ..., etc.) The main idea behind this is that once there will be more PIs I want the PICO to make a PI availability schedule in advance to ensure that a PI (=PIoD) will get in touch with a new member within 1 - 2 hours (if it is not early morning) instead of 12+ hours. DaLe 21:07, 31 July 2007 (EDT)
- I can do it so that you choose the PI "on duty" for any new members, or I can have the system automatically assign new members to the PI with the fewest cadets. It's really up to you. :) Licah 20:31, 31 July 2007 (EDT)