Talk:World of Warcraft: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Fcsuper (talk | contribs)
AfD on second thought
 
RS David (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
I was in favor of the AfD tag.  However, upon looking at the "what links here" link, I am having second thoughts.  However, it is unlikely someone looking for info on World of Warcraft will be coming to our wiki.  And if they did, there's not much point in trying to attract them, unless by some small miracle that google will bring us potential new members who unwittingly find use by looking up sites that talk about WoW. :)  <span style="color:Purple">—</span> '''[[User:Fcsuper|<span style="color:#006699">f</span><span style="color:#6666FF">c</span><span style="color:#666699">s</span><span style="color:#336633">u</span><span style="color:#006699">p</span><span style="color:#6633FF">e</span><span style="color:#9966FF">r</span>]]'''<sup> ([[User talk:Fcsuper|<span style="color:Olive">What?</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Fcsuper|<span style="color:Teal">Where!</span>]])</sup> <sub>([http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Inclusionism <span style="color:Maroon">Inclusionistic</span>] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism <span style="color:Red">Eventualist</span>] ) </sub><span style="color:Purple">—</span> 23:15, 5 February 2009 (EST)
I was in favor of the AfD tag.  However, upon looking at the "what links here" link, I am having second thoughts.  However, it is unlikely someone looking for info on World of Warcraft will be coming to our wiki.  And if they did, there's not much point in trying to attract them, unless by some small miracle that google will bring us potential new members who unwittingly find use by looking up sites that talk about WoW. :)  <span style="color:Purple">—</span> '''[[User:Fcsuper|<span style="color:#006699">f</span><span style="color:#6666FF">c</span><span style="color:#666699">s</span><span style="color:#336633">u</span><span style="color:#006699">p</span><span style="color:#6633FF">e</span><span style="color:#9966FF">r</span>]]'''<sup> ([[User talk:Fcsuper|<span style="color:Olive">What?</span>]], [[Special:Contributions/Fcsuper|<span style="color:Teal">Where!</span>]])</sup> <sub>([http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Inclusionism <span style="color:Maroon">Inclusionistic</span>] [http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Eventualism <span style="color:Red">Eventualist</span>] ) </sub><span style="color:Purple">—</span> 23:15, 5 February 2009 (EST)
: Well, if we '''did''' want to attract WoW playing people, I have a feeling the current status of the page would scare them away sh**less, or at the least just piss them off for having clicked on a worthless link. - [[User:RS David|HeavyD]] 11:04, 6 February 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 16:04, 6 February 2009

I was in favor of the AfD tag. However, upon looking at the "what links here" link, I am having second thoughts. However, it is unlikely someone looking for info on World of Warcraft will be coming to our wiki. And if they did, there's not much point in trying to attract them, unless by some small miracle that google will bring us potential new members who unwittingly find use by looking up sites that talk about WoW. :) — fcsuper (What?, Where!) (Inclusionistic Eventualist ) — 23:15, 5 February 2009 (EST)

Well, if we did want to attract WoW playing people, I have a feeling the current status of the page would scare them away sh**less, or at the least just piss them off for having clicked on a worthless link. - HeavyD 11:04, 6 February 2009 (EST)