Difference between revisions of "Talk:Medals"
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New section: There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article) |
m (→There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article: what's in a name) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
== There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article == | == There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article == | ||
− | There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article. Please review the article and remove those sections. For example, there is discussion able what should be changed in the bylaws. This should be implemented or not, but either way, it should be rv from the article itself. | + | There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article. Please review the article and remove those sections. For example, there is discussion able what should be changed in the bylaws. This should be implemented or not, but either way, it should be rv from the article itself. --[[User:Fcsuper|Fcsuper]] 10:44, 6 July 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 14:44, 6 July 2008
All the previous discussions can be found here.
Recent topics of discussion:
- Fleets medals should be standardized and consolidated into fleet medals where possible.
- Commendation medals are too specific.
- Violet Cluster should not be retired because it is a "fun" medal.
- Alvace Star and Burdine Cluster should be replaced with names more relevant to the RS.
- MP Combat medals guidelines - should they be a daily averages or weekly total? should this include internal or just be for external competitions? should MP medals be recommended by the OO or MO?
relabel
Just a suggestion to relabel "New Proposal" as something that suggests this has been implemented. Fcsuper 20:51, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article
There's still a lot of discussionary entries in this article. Please review the article and remove those sections. For example, there is discussion able what should be changed in the bylaws. This should be implemented or not, but either way, it should be rv from the article itself. --Fcsuper 10:44, 6 July 2008 (EDT)